Teflon
Lawsuit- You May Be Eligible For a Settlement Check
Teflon
Class Action Lawsuit
IF
YOU HAVE TEFLON PRODUCTS, YOU MAY BE ELIGIBLE FOR A SETTLEMENT CHECK:
CONTACT CLASS ACTION LAW FIRMS FOR INFORMATION
DuPont Corporation is involved with a
class-action lawsuit accusing the company of failing to warn the
consumer about the health hazards of Teflon non-stick coatings sold
with millions of products across the world. Two Florida legal offices
said they were filing the lawsuit on behalf of 14 individuals who
bought and used Teflon cookware and other consumer products.
•DuPont
denies that TEFLON Causes Cancer, stating its products were safe
and has vowed to vigorously defend. The Plaintiffs want
DuPont Corporation to spend $5 Billion Dollars to replace millions
of consumers cookware, pots and pans, and other consumer items and
to issue Teflon health warnings in the future.The Plaintiffs also
want a monetary class action settlement fund to be created for medical
monitoring and screening of consumers who purchased Teflon products
in the past.
•Does Teflon
Cause Cancer?
Teflon was created in
the 1934 by DuPont, the American firm which sells it today to make
non-stick cookware, and also sells it as a stain repellant coating
for clothes and carpets. Teflon products contain perfluorooctanoic
acid (PFOA), a chemical which some leading scientists claim is "likely"
to cause cancer in humans. "The DuPont Corporation has known
for 22 long years that the Teflon products and the PFOA chemicals
it is made from cause cancer in rats and other test animals,"
said Florida-based lawyers Andrew Cluger. The Plaintiffs are taking
the position that they do not have to prove that Teflon
Causes Cancer, "
I only have to prove that DuPont lied in a huge and blatant attempt
to continue selling their products into the marketplace." DuPont
Corporation denies the claim: "United States Consumers using
millions of quality products sold with the Teflon label are safe."
a spokesperson said. "Cookware and other products that contain
the DuPont Teflon non-stick coatings do not contain PFOA."
Recently, the company agreed an out-of-court settlement in a class-action
lawsuit filed by thousands of people who live near DuPont's West
Virginia factory. The residents, who lived along the OH River south
of Parkersville, Virginia, claim the corporation had contaminated
regional water supplies with PFOA. (The Chemical claimed to be in
teflon) They alleged that the chemical has been linked to many birth
defects and other health and safety hazards. DuPont Company did
eventually agree to pay 50 million dollars in cash to the plaintiffs,
plus $22 million dollars in associated legal costs. The company
also agreed to spend $10 million dollars to build special water-treatment
plants to filter out the chemical PFOA. DuPont did not accept any
liability and maintains that the chemical PFOA does not present
any dangers to the Consumer market place. Earlier this year, DuPont
Incorporated received a legal subpoena from the United States Environmental
Crimes' department to hand over any documents about PFOA that they
have in their files. That was after agreements were made with DuPont
to settle claims by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency that
DuPont had failed to disclose heath information data about PFOA
for over 21 years.
|
|
DUPONT
TEFLON LAWSUIT
The Federal Government
has reached an agreement with DuPont Corporation to settle allegations
the business hid details about the dangers of a toxic chemicals
also known as C-8 used in the manufacture of Teflon. Legal Experts
for Du Pont and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency told an
administrative-law judge on November 22 that they had reached a
final legal agreement, but that they needed more days to draft the
paper work. Judge Barb B. Ganning then gave the parties until January
13th to file the formalized agreements. "The requests for additional
days is to help accommodate E.P.A. procedural rules which usually
require that the Environmental Appeals Boards review and approve
any settlements That are reached by the parties," the EPA stated
Wednesday's statement. Officials from both the U.S. EPA and DuPont
corporation declined to release terms of the deal.
"We are not talking
about that particular issue at this time," said Robert Olly,
spokeswoman for DuPont's Washington Works plant south of Parkersburg,
West Virginia. The EPA alleged that DuPont for over 21 years covered
up important information about C8's health effects and about the
pollution of water supplies near the company's Washington Works
plant. Under federal law, DuPont could face civil fines of more
than $300 million for not reporting information that showed C8 posed
"substantial risk of injury to health or the environment."
The company has set aside $15 million to cover the costs of the
lawsuit, according to corporate disclosures filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission. DuPont also faces a federal criminal investigation
of its actions concerning C8 pollution, the company has told shareholders.
Since May, DuPont and the EPA repeatedly have said they were close
to a settlement in the civil case, but had one item left to resolve.
They would not identify that item.
DuPont has maintained
that C8, also known as perfluorooctanoic acid or PFOA, has no negative
health effects. In February, DuPont settled a class-action lawsuit
for $107.6 million brought by Ohio and West Virginia residents in
2001, alleging the Wilmington, Delaware based company intentionally
withheld and misrepresented information concerning the nature and
extent of the human health threat posed by C8.
The EPA in July 2004
filed a complaint that alleged DuPont had caused "widespread
contamination" of drinking water supplies near its Washington
Works plant. The EPA also alleged DuPont never told the federal
government that the company had water tests that showed C-8 in local
water supplies in concentrations greater than the company's own
internal limits. The EPA alleged DuPont withheld the results of
a test showing that at least one pregnant worker from the Washington
Works factory had transferred the chemical from her body to her
unborn fetus. That information, the EPA said, supported scientific
animal tests showing that C8 "moves across the placental barrier."
The EPA said that agency efforts to understand C8's health effects
"might have been more expeditious" if DuPont had submitted
the human test results in 1982.
Teflon
Lawsuit To Begin
Various Law Firs from
across America will be appearing at the federal courthouse in Des
Moines, Iowa to start proceedings in a class action lawsuit claiming
that the Teflon used to make cooking pans, pots, utensils and other
consumer goods are harmful and dangerous.The
Class action lawyers represent at least 15 class-action lawsuits
files across the U.S., one that is from Des Moines, Iowa. Marcie
Larksburg had numerous Teflon pans and utensils in her kitchen.
She's a plaintiff in the class-action lawsuit that has been filed
in local Des Moines, Iowa District Court. "I had more than
a dozen pots &pans. I am holding on to them, hoping to get them
replaced at the expense of the Dupont Company that made the Teflon,"
she said. Larksburg said she no longer use s Teflon products."She
is not ill or even feeling badly at this point. We are talking about
the products themselves and the great potential for it to make people
very, very sick," Stephen Mandroson , one of Larkburg's class-action
attorneys, has stated. DuPont Corporation, the company that manufactures
Teflon products said the potential just is not there. The company's
Web pages address the Teflon lawsuits, stating "contrary to
the allegations, there is no reliable evidence that demonstrates
that there is danger to the American consumer from using Teflon-coated
pots and pans under normal kitchen cooking conditions. Cookware
coated with Teflon is completely safe when used according to the
directions. In fact, over the past 41 years and running, there is
only one documented case of a minor health problem as a result of
non-stick products." Mandroson's argument will be at the center
of the class action lawsuits. A federal judge will be the one to
decide whether Teflon is harmful to the American Consumer. "The
sciences indicate that there is something that people need to be
concerned about with regard to the active chemicals in Teflon Products,"
Mandroson said. The decision made in court could affect millions
of consumers across the United States. "I think it will ultimately
effect anyone in North America that has a Teflon related cooking
product.". Attorneys want DuPont to pay for replacements for
anyone who bought Teflon-covered cooking utensils.
The suit is not
claiming that anyone got sick as a result of Teflon, just that the
potential is there because it has chemicals in it. A panel of federal
judges decided that the case would be heard in Des Moines. The first
hearing will be Thursday morning.
- TO
FILE A CLAIM, CONTACT ONE OF THE LAW FIRMS LISTED
|